best and quality

NPP Communicator Ellen Daaku Questions NDC’s Dependence on Drones for Collating Election Results

 

In a recent episode of the Citi TV Breakfast Dairy, Ellen Daaku, a communicator for the New Patriotic Party (NPP), expressed skepticism regarding the National Democratic Congress’s (NDC) reliance on drones for collating election results. Daaku’s remarks come amid growing discussions about the use of technology in Ghana’s electoral processes and the upcoming general elections.

During the program, Daaku made a bold statement, saying, “The last time I checked, the NDC couldn’t collate their results, so if they think that it is drones that will help them do that, I don’t think it is a problem.” Her comments stirred debate and raised questions about the feasibility and effectiveness of using drones for election result collation.

Daaku’s assertion references past elections where the NDC faced challenges in collating and transmitting election results in a timely and efficient manner. These challenges often led to delays, disputes, and allegations of electoral malpractice, undermining the credibility of the electoral process.

The NPP communicator’s skepticism towards the NDC’s adoption of drone technology for result collation reflects broader concerns about the potential risks and limitations associated with technology-driven electoral reforms. While technology can undoubtedly enhance transparency, efficiency, and accuracy in the electoral process, its successful implementation depends on various factors, including infrastructure, cybersecurity, and institutional capacity.

In response to Daaku’s remarks, representatives from the NDC defended their decision to explore innovative solutions, such as drones, to improve the electoral process. They emphasized the need for continuous innovation and adaptation to address the evolving challenges and demands of modern elections. They also highlighted the potential benefits of drone technology, such as faster data collection, enhanced transparency, and reduced human error.

The debate over the use of drones for election result collation underscores broader discussions about the role of technology in Ghana’s democratic governance. Proponents argue that technology can help strengthen electoral integrity, increase voter confidence, and promote democratic participation. They cite examples from other countries where technology has been successfully utilized to improve election administration and enhance transparency.

However, critics raise concerns about the risks and vulnerabilities associated with technology-driven electoral processes. They caution against over-reliance on technology, highlighting the importance of maintaining robust safeguards, transparency mechanisms, and accountability frameworks to mitigate potential risks, such as cybersecurity threats, data breaches, and manipulation of electronic systems.

Moreover, the successful implementation of technology in elections requires careful planning, stakeholder engagement, and investment in capacity building. It also necessitates a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework to govern the use of technology and ensure compliance with international standards and best practices.

As Ghana prepares for the upcoming general elections, the debate over the use of drones for result collation serves as a reminder of the ongoing efforts to modernize and reform the electoral process. While technology offers promising opportunities to enhance electoral transparency and efficiency, it is essential to approach its adoption with caution, ensuring that it complements existing electoral mechanisms and safeguards the integrity of the democratic process.

story filed by: Nana kwaku Duah

Facebook
WhatsApp

Related Post